但同性戀者仍然不滿意，覺得同性戀一詞帶有歧視成分，所以從一九八七年開始同性戀一詞已不再出現在美國精神醫學會的精神病診斷手冊內，取而代之的是「性取向困擾」診斷（Distress About Sexual Orientation），即不論同性戀或異性戀者，只有被自己性取向困擾的人士才需要接受治療，這不單包括「不接受自己是同性戀」的同性戀者，亦包括「不接受自己是異性戀」（想做同性戀）的異性戀者！
Agree.
Actually, we might not only think whether we want to support/ accept/ disagree/ discriminate homosexual.
Maybe we have to worry about 逆向歧視 in the future.
If the law of forbidden discrimiantion of homosexual were passed, the people expressed their opinion/ view of not accepting homosexual would commit the crime.
In some foreign country with this law passed, the school would provide education on homosexual.
In 2005, one American, David Parker was caught by police when he intruded the kidergarten for stopping his son to receive education on homosexual. The court verged that the kidergarten had the right to provide homosexual education and the parent had no right to stop it.
In Hong Kong, the book shop refused to display the booklet of one Lesbian group and the book shop was disturbed by the group member in 2005.
發表於 
返回列表
