原文章由 conniechan1975 於 07-11-27 09:44 AM 發表
thanks a lot
i want to know. base on LONG LASTING. is plasma or LCD is better? e.g. repair, damage, etc.. i notice plasma price is cheaper then LCD...
原文章由 conniechan1975 於 07-11-27 10:38 AM 發表
also. sony lcd seem the most expensive. is it the best? how about philips, samsung, sharp, toshiba, LG, prima, shinco LCD? pls comments. base on long lasting, repair cost.... thanks
原文章由 conniechan1975 於 07-11-29 01:19 PM 發表
wah. u r so expertise. hahhaha. thanks for your explanation. i am thinking to buy a 52 inches LCD tv now. but i may wait in 2008 to see any build in tunner box for 高清.
base on long lasting, do u think sony lcd is the best? coz i wont buy a tv so often. i can use a tv more then 10 years or 20 years if there is no damage
原文章由 kc1016 於 07-11-29 03:00 發表
淨係 s . o . n . y 呢 4 個英文字都幾K啦 ... XD
Philips 畫質唔錯 ... de-interalce (其中一樣功能係除狗牙) 做得好唔錯 ... 亦保持歐系機畫面o既柔麗 ... 正 ... 缺點係比較貴 ... :-(
Sharp 就主要贏o係 panel 表面優秀 ... 黑色表現沉實 .. 相對會令立體感同對比觀感加強 ... 缺點係 de-interlace 效能一般, ... 常見狗牙 ... 高階 model 上呢個問題就細好多, 都做得幾好 (當然我呢o的前行業份子先會 "聞" 電視o既畫質 ... 其實放o係屋企, 人坐o係梳化都幾難見到狗牙 ... XD)
...